Assignment 3, Scholarly paper or Independent Newspaper Feature Story


Because of the situatedness of a scholarly paper (in standard English, "their specialized nature"), you may not want to write one for this class.  As an option, we will have an alternative assignment which is writing a feature story for a local, independent newspaper or news weekly.

Usually, you can tell which of these two assignments you'd prefer to write based on your major.  If your field is in the humanities, I would prefer that you stick with the scholarly paper.  If your field is not -- if it is, for example, engineering, computer science, or chemistry -- I would like you to consider which assignment would be more useful to you.  Read the goals of each genre, below, and make your own decision, letting your instructor know which you select before getting too far down the road of drafting.



Scholarly Paper

Large pigeonhole filing system
We've discussed, particularly in the "Inventing the University" article, how and what we write tend to pigeonhole us socially.  This isn't necessarily a bad thing; being able to write like a community -- being familiar with their genres -- often allows us entrance into those same communities with less resistance.

Yet at the same time, unlearning the habits of intermediate genres is often something important to perform.  For instance, when we wrote an application letter, layout on the printed page was nearly as important as content.  Foregrounding our qualifications for employment, specifically by putting them first in the letter, was of absolute importance.  We also created two kinds of pictures, one with narrative (an anecdote) and another with lists (our description of experience), that would not occur in a standard "five-paragraph paper."  Though many of the same things that were important to the "five-paragraph paper" were still essential, from good grammar to good, readable style, we made nearly as many changes to those rules as the number of rules we actually kept.

Even within academia, the research paper continues to change shape, moving from a five paragraph paper that treats three topics quickly, with minimal integration to a sustained consideration of the nuanced themes within particular works.  We've talked a bit about the style and content of typical five paragraph essays, and read through a bit about what Friedrich Nietzsche had to say about their content as quoted by Friedrich Kittler.  Often, they claim, "we" are taught to write about ourselves, our own reactions to information, making our five paragraph compositions very much reader responses.  Kittler sums his and Nietzsche's shared critique that this "'appeal to the individual' is the opposite of scholarly training... precisely because the model pupil takes [this appeal] literally" (Kittler 181-2).

What's missing -- and what we're looking to correct -- is that the "model pupil" thinks academia wants to hear about them specifically, when writing about oneself is often really a crutch to enable writing, and to have these excercises inch writers towards confidence in composition.  That is, since writing about oneself often makes it easy to overcome writers' block and create content, instructors often encourage this sort of writing so that there is some writing to review and to improve upon.  Perhaps you're not ready to write about Marxist critiques of Emerson's "Wealth" and "Power," but you're probably ready to write about what you might think while reading those two works.


Assignment Description

It's time for us to drop the crutch of writing about ourselves, and to try to have our writing do the work of entering a scholarly conversation.  I'm going to suggest approaching this task with a specific strategy.  We'll first read a work of literature closely.  Close reading means that you don't simply skim (or "raid") the text, but write down quotes or ideas that seem particularly interesting to you (hang on; we'll break from writing about ourselves in just a second).  You might take these notes on another sheet of paper, or you might write in some marginalia as you read.  We'll practice close reading in class.

As you're reading, you'll notice ways to connect the different ideas that you've noticed while reading.  We'll call these "overarching themes," or subjects that the author returns to again and again.  These might be images from the work, or it might be a topic that you do find personally important that would benefit from being brought into contact with this piece of literature.


Assignment Requirements

For this assignment, we're going to write a sustained paper of approximately nine pages and 3300 words on a scholarly work which will be introduced in class. 

To be overly clear, this will be a paper of at least nine pages in length and 3300 words of Times New Roman, 12-point font.  Margins should be no more than one inch for the top and bottom and one and a quarter inches (1.25") for the left and right margins.  Text should be double-spaced, as this allows for easier editing by reviewers both when printed and when comments are added electronically.